重症肌无力患者单纤维肌电图与低频重复电刺激测定的对比研究  被引量:5

Comparative study on single fiber electromyography and low frequency repetitive nerve stimulations in patients with myasthenia gravis.

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈向军[1] 程源深[1] 周宝礼[1] 

机构地区:[1]浙江医科大学附属第二医院神经科

出  处:《临床脑电学杂志》1996年第3期141-144,共4页

摘  要:通过对46例确诊的重症肌无力(MG)患者进行低频重复电刺激(LFRNS)和单纤维肌电图(SFEMG)的对比研究,部分病例还作了常规同心针极肌电图(CNEMG)检查。发现LFRNS阳性率为57%。受检的三组肌肉中三角肌阳性率最高(48%)。SFEMG阳性率为91%,其中轻型(改良Osserman分型中Ⅰ、Ⅱ_A型)为88%,重型(Ⅱ_B、Ⅲ、Ⅳ和V型)为100%。两种检查阳性率有显著性差异(P<0.01)。SFEMG是目前诊断MG最为敏感的电生理方法。轻型MG临床未表现肌无力的肌肉中也存在着潜在的神经肌肉传递障碍。Jitter阻滞率是反映MG病情严重程度的良好指标。CNEMG有助于排除和发现临床上症状相似的其它疾病或其它疾病同时伴发MG者。The comparison between single fiber electromyography (SFEMG) and low frequency repetitive nerve stimulations (LFRNS) in 46 patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) was studied, in whom 20 were also examined by a conventional needle-electrode electromyography (CNEMG). The positivity rate of LFRNS was 56. 52%,the abnormality of the deltoid muscle tested among three muscles was the highest (48%) and the positivity of SFEMG accounted for 91. 30% in which the mild type (modified Osserman Classification: Type Ⅰ,ⅡA) made up 88 24%,severe type (Type ⅡB,Ⅲ,Ⅳ,V)100%.Statistically, there was a significant difference between them (P<0.01). Currently. SFEMG might be the most sensitive method in the diagnosis of MG. The asymptomatic muscles in the mild type MG also demonstrated the pontential abnormal neuromuscular transmission. Impulse blocking was a valuable parameter in reflecting the severity of the disease and CNEMG was favorable to exclude and discover the diseases that were similar to or associated with MG.

关 键 词:重症肌无力 单纤维肌电图 低频重复电刺激 

分 类 号:R746.104[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象