德里达与塞尔  

Derrida and Searl

作　　者：陆扬[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学系

出　　处：《哲学研究》2006年第11期77-82,共6页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：The controversy between Jacques Derrida and John Searle focusing on J.L.Austin’s theory of speech act may reflect the misunderstanding between Anglo-American and the Continental philosophies.On the one hand,Derrida questions about Austin’s explaining meaning in terms of context,regarding the meaning coming from iterance.On the other hand,Searle argues that Derrida misreads Austin and does not catch up Austin’s words.Accordingly,Derrida’s response seems to be a typical parody and irony which is far from the logical preciseness of philosophy.Does the contest reproduce the ancient quarrel between poetry and philosophy as what Plato refers to? In what degree Derrida’s writing may stand for a literary position,or is it possible for both Searle and Derrida to reconsider the other side’s method mutually? The paper tries to give an analysis to answer above questions.The controversy between Jacques Derrida and John Searle focusing on J.L.Austin's theory of speech act may reflect the misunderstanding between Anglo-American and the Continental philosophies.On the one hand,Derrida questions about Austin's explaining meaning in terms of context,regarding the meaning coming from iterance.On the other hand,Searle argues that Derrida misreads Austin and does not catch up Austin's words.Accordingly,Derrida's response seems to be a typical parody and irony which is far from the logical preciseness of philosophy.Does the contest reproduce the ancient quarrel between poetry and philosophy as what Plato refers to? In what degree Derrida's writing may stand for a literary position,or is it possible for both Searle and Derrida to reconsider the other side's method mutually? The paper tries to give an analysis to answer above questions.

关 键 词：德里达 塞尔 言语行为理论 大陆哲学 哲学家 哲学传统 学术训练 奥斯汀 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]