检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任珺[1] 章真[1] 邬筱莹[1] 王文超[1] 陆惠忠[1] 郭晓梅[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射治疗科复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海200032
出 处:《中国癌症杂志》2006年第12期1043-1045,共3页China Oncology
摘 要:背景与目的:电子实时定位检验成像系统(EPID)是目前应用较多的用于分析放疗质控的工具。本研究比较技术员和医师应用EPID对摆位误差图像分析的差异,探讨技术员独立应用EPID进行摆位误差监测的可行性。方法:2005年5月—2005年8月,接受盆腔放疗12例患者。应用EPID拍摄每天前/后野,两侧野,共得到244组图像,数据由医师和技术员分别分析得到。结果:244组图像分析结果,医师和技术员在左右、前后和头脚3个方向数据分析的差异平均值分别为:(1.0±0.9)mm,(1.0±0.9)mm和(0.8±0.8)mm。两者间差异无显著性。结论:技术员可以应用EPID独立完成对盆腔摆位图像分析,进行误差的监测,为进一步进行自适应性放疗的开展积累经验。Background and purpose: EPID is a tool which was conventionaly used for QA of radiotherapy. We investigated the feasibility of trained therapists use EPID to evaluation of set-up errors by analysis data difference between physicians and therapists. Methods: From May to Aug. 2005, physicians and therapists collected two sets of 244 images separately from the same 12 patients. All patients got pelvic irradiation. Daily localization images were taken by EPID. Results: In the three directions of right to left, anterior to posterior and inferior to superior, the mean difference was ( 1.0 ± 0.9)mm, ( 1.0 ±0.9) mm and (0.8±0.8) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between physicians and therapists in EPID analysis. Conclusions: Trained therapists can use EPID analysis tools in evaluation set-up errors in pelvic irradiation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188