检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾庆东[1] 吕丽红[2] 张秀国[1] 吕斌[1] 高学军[3] 公伟[1] 李占元[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学齐鲁医院普通外科,济南市250012 [2]山东大学齐鲁医院医学院手术学教研室,济南市250012 [3]博兴县人民医院外科
出 处:《中华肝胆外科杂志》2006年第11期748-750,共3页Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)联合健择治疗晚期胰腺癌的有效性。方法将46例不能切除的晚期胰腺癌无黄疸病人随机分为:HIFU联合健择组24例,单用健择组22例。全部病例随访2~18个月。Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,计算6个月、12个月生存率和中位生存期;采用LogRank法进行组间比较。两组治疗后的疼痛缓解率采用x2检验。结果HIFU联合健择组的24例病人中位生存时间为10.56个月,6个月和12个月的生存率分别是75.0%和30.9%;而单用健择组的22例病人中位生存时间为6.71个月,6个月和12个月的生存率分别是36.4%和13.0%。两组比较,HIFU联合健择组优于单用健择组,差异有显著性(P<0.01)。HIFU联合健择组24例病人的疼痛缓解率(疼痛强度降低或消失,止痛剂减少或停止应用)87.5%;而单用健择组22例病人的缓解率为36.4%。两组比较,HIFU联合健择组明显优于单用健择组(P<0.01)。结论HIFU联合健择组治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效明显优于单用健择组,因此本方法有望成为治疗晚期胰腺癌的一种有效手段。Objective To study high intensity focused ultrasound therapy (HIFUT) in combination with gemcitabine for treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC). Methods A total of 46 patients were randomized into 2 groups. The patients in group A (n=24) received HIFUT in combination with gemcitabine and those in group B (n=22) were given gemcitabine alone. The follow-up time was 2-- 18 months in both groups. The median survival time, 6-month and 12-month survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and LogRank test. The pain remission rate of the 2 groups was compared by Ze test. Results The median survival time, 6-month and 12-month survival rates were significantly higher in group A than in group B (10. 56 months vs. 6.71 months, 75.0% vs. 36.4%, 30. 9% vs. 13.0%, P〈0. 01). Meanwhile, the pain remission rate was markedly higher in group A than in group B (87.5% vs. 36.4%, P〈0. 01). Conclusions HIFUT in combination with gemcitabine is better than gemcitabine alone. The former may become of the most effective treat ments for APC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222