检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:强昌文[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽大学,安徽合肥230039
出 处:《政法论坛》2006年第6期44-57,共14页Tribune of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科项目<伦理观的变迁与法律权利之发展>(03BFX001)的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:契约伦理是一种具有影响力的伦理类型,但它在中国与西方的境遇是截然不同的。中国传统文化中的牢固的血缘家庭关系、整体主义和漠视利益,使契约伦理失去了外部环境、主体性条件和动力机制,而西方传统文化中的淡薄的血缘家庭关系、个体主义和注重利益,使契约伦理有了良好的外部环境、主体性条件和动力机制。这些不同,导致了中国权利观念和制度的落后,西方权利观念和制度的发达。This thesis discusses the relationship between Chinese and Western circumstances of contractual ethics and differentiation of rights. Following the historical clue, this chapter exposes the contractual ethics under the different circumstances of Chinese and Western society. In traditional Chinese culture, the solid family system based on blood relationship, the integrity, and the ignorance to interests have stripped the contractual ethics of its external surroundings, subjective conditions and motivation mechanism, while in traditional Western culture, the loose family system based on blood relationship, the prevalence of individualism, and the emphasis on interests provide the contractual ethics with preferable external surroundings, subjective conditions and motivation mechanism. The thesis also briefly compares the Chinese and Western conceptions of rights and rights systems in the process of analyzing the reasons for the marginalization of Chinese contractual ethics and the centralization of Western contractual ethics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3