检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范远娴[1] 程传虎[1] 刘锦文[1] 钟兰生[1]
出 处:《实用医技杂志》2006年第22期3930-3931,共2页Journal of Practical Medical Techniques
摘 要:目的研究对比剂动态增强磁共振成像(MRI)对垂体微腺瘤的诊断作用。方法临床拟诊的垂体微腺瘤50例行快速自旋回波对比剂动态增强扫描,接着行常规增强扫描,分析比较动态增强和常规增强两种方法对垂体微腺瘤的检出率。结果常规增强组垂体微腺瘤的检出率为72%;动态增强组垂体微腺瘤的检出率为94%。结论动态增强扫描能明显提高垂体微腺瘤的检出率。Objective To determine whether dynamic-enhanced MR imaging is superior to standard MR imaging after contrast administration for detecting pituitary microadenoma. Methods 50 cases of clinically suspected microadenoma were examined with dynamic-enhanced MR imaging, and standard imaging with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spin-echo sequences were obtained. The threesequences were evaluated retrospectively and graded for gland-lesion contrast conspicuity, lesion, homogeneity, and delineation of lesion margin. Results The positive rate of microadenoma was 94% for dynamic-enhanced MRI group and 72% for routinely contrast-enhanced group. Conclusion Dynamic-enhanced MR1 is the best method for the diagnosis of pituitary microadenoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28