刑事诉讼中非法证据排除机制研究  

The research on the illegal evidence excluding system in criminal lawsuit

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:徐明[1] 刘艳华[1] 黄国华[1] 

机构地区:[1]吉林省人民检察院,吉林长春130062

出  处:《吉林公安高等专科学校学报》2006年第6期33-35,共3页Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy

摘  要:司法实践存在排除非法证据的“界定难”、“证明难”和“排除难”问题。为有效预防非法取证,现有的司法制度应贯彻无罪推定原则;完善司法令状制度,重大侦查行为应“有证实行,例外明示列举”;建立重大案件首次讯问值班律师临场监督制度;推进对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人讯问同步录音、录像制度;实行侦羁分离和建立公派律师值班制度;建立侦查人员出庭作证制度。there are many problems in judicial practice, such as the "dark bound", the "un sufficient evidence", the "difficult solution" in illegal evidence. In order to prevent the illegal evidence effectively, the present judicial system should insist the innocent principle; we must perfect the judicial system and make sure that all the important spy affairs take action with effective evidence. If there are any special examples, we must put it out. For the serious case we could establish a temporary surveillance system at once, so the lawyers could inquest when they are on duty. Besides all these, promoting the recording system while the suspects are interrogated, separating the spy procedure and the surveillance, establishing the system for the lawyers to be on duty in turn, and setting up the system for the spy officers to be witness are very significant.

关 键 词:非法证据 界定 证明 排除 预防 

分 类 号:D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象