检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘增龙[1] 韩建生[1] 颜敏[1] 成玉敏[1] 周会爽[1] 赵明坤[1]
出 处:《河北职工医学院学报》2006年第4期9-11,共3页Journal of Hebei Medical College for Continuing Education
摘 要:目的比较米安色林和博乐欣治疗抑郁症的疗效和不良反应。方法以CCMD-3作为诊断标准,采用HAMD、TESS量表及其临床疗效评定标准分别评定疗效和副反应。结果米安色林和博乐欣的疗效相近,米安色林的临床治愈率和总有效率分别为53%和84%,博乐欣的临床治愈率和总有效率分别为60%和90%。结论两者临床疗效无显著差异,但博乐欣起效快,副反应小,米安色林服药方便。Objective To compare the efficacy and the side effects of Mianserin and Vanlafaxinine in the treatment of depression. Methods According to the CCMD -3, the efficacy and its side effects were evaluated with HAMD,TESS,CGI_SI. Results Both drugs had similar efficacy in the treatment of depression:the cured rate and the clinical improvements rate of Mianserin were 53 % and 84% respectively wthe cured rate and the clinical improvements rate of Vanlafaxine were 60% and 90% respectively . Conclution The results show that the efficacy of Mianserin is similar with that of Vanlafaxine, Vanlafaxine is an effective and safe antidepressant, but Mianserin is convenient.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157