中国仲裁制度的实证研究  

Positivist Research of China's Arbitration System

作　　者：刘武俊[1] 

机构地区：[1]<中国司法>编辑部,北京100020

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第1期46-55,共10页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：现行仲裁制度依然存在理想与现实之间比较明显的反差,面临着在制度上和理论上被边缘化的双重尴尬境地。发展仲裁制度必须改革和重构仲裁的司法监督制度;扩大仲裁委员会的自治性权力;进一步淡化仲裁机构的行政化色彩;淡化仲裁的诉讼化色彩,强化仲裁的意思自治原则;科学划分仲裁组织和仲裁机构之间的职权;适当扩大仲裁范围和放宽对仲裁协议要件的要求。未来中国仲裁业的具体发展目标就是以发展机制市场化、工作体制社会化、机构建设规范化为方向,在稳健发展的基础上,实现仲裁机构在全国范围的合理布局,建设一大批规模化的优秀仲裁委员会,培育若干在国内乃至国际仲裁界有一定影响的区域仲裁中心,进一步实现仲裁工作的正规化、科学化和现代化。Obvious contrast between ideal and reality still exists in current arbitration system, which is faced with a dual embarrassment of being marginalized in system and in theory. To develop arbitration system, judicial supervision system of arbitration must be reformed and reconstructed. Arbitration committee＇s autonomous authority must be expanded; administrative feature of arbitration organizations must be further reduced; lawsuit feature of arbitration should be lightened. Functions and powers of arbitration organizations and arbitration setups must be scientifically divided. Arbitration scope should be properly expanded and the demand for arbitration agreement documents should be properly softened. The concrete development goal of China＇s arbitration is to realize reasonable layout of arbitration organizations in a national scope, to build up a large quantities of outstanding arbitration committees, to cultivate some regional arbitration centers which are influential in domestic and even international arbitration circle and to further realize the standardization, scientificization and modernization of arbitration work on the basis of steady development.

关 键 词：仲裁制度 仲裁法 一裁终局制 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]