大国政治视角下的工业化道路超越论——兼评“超越论”的几种观点  

Path Selection of Industrialization under Power Politics——Discussion with Wu Jinglian

作　　者：盛正德[1] 李仉辉[2] 

机构地区：[1]上海金融学院经济系,上海201209 [2]上海商学院国际经济贸易系,上海200235

出　　处：《华东经济管理》2007年第1期154-158,共5页East China Economic Management

摘　　要：根据马克思主义政治与经济关系原理,中国作为一个尚处在工业化中期阶段的未来的世界大国,面对复杂的大国政治、地缘政治博弈和超级大国及列强实质上的遏制战略,从国家安全(包括经济安全)和领土主权完整、经济发展诸方面考虑,中国只有继续发展重化工业,完成工业化进程,才符合自己的国家利益。仅仅根据目前发展重化工业中存在的弊端及其对经济和社会发展的负面后果,从逻辑上并不能得出中国应当少发展甚至超越重化工业发展阶段的当然结论。只要制度选择得当,技术路线正确,重化工业的充分发展不仅可以是有效率和可持续的,且可以为第三产业大发展提供现实需求。According to Marxist principle of political and economic relations, China, as a potential wodd power in the mid way to industrialization and in the face of complex power politics, Geopolitical game and virtual containment strategy of superpower and other powers, should continue to develop its heavy industry and thus complete its industrialization process so as to comply with its national interest, considering China＇s national security （including economic security）, sovereignty and territorial integrity and economic development. The taking - for - granted conclusion that China should develop less or overpass the development stage of heavy industrialization cannot be drawn logically only from negative effects of present heavy industry development practice on economy and social development. The full development of heavy industry can be effective and sustainable and provide real support for development of tertiary industry.

关 键 词：大国政治 工业化道路 选择 

分 类 号：F270[经济管理—企业管理]