老年口腔患者对两种光源固化灯临床应用的心理接受评价  

Evaluation on psychological acceptance of aged patients for light-emitting diode curing light and halogen light

作　　者：王青青[1] 郭斌[1] 阙克华[1] 谢思静[1] 刘静[1] 杨帆[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学华西口腔医学院老年口腔医学研究室,硕士生四川610041

出　　处：《中华老年口腔医学杂志》2007年第1期29-30,33,共3页Chinese Journal of Geriatric Dentistry

摘　　要：目的:了解牙科发光二极管光固化灯和普通卤光灯应用于老年患者洞型树脂充填固化后,其心理接受的评价。方法:按纳入标准随机选择门诊就诊老年患者25例,共计患牙160颗(楔状缺损和龋损各80颗),患牙随机分为实验组和对照组。(去龋)备洞、隔湿、消毒,干燥,充填后,实验组采用发光二极管光固化灯固化,对照组采用普通卤光灯固化。所有患者在接受治疗后完成心理测试量表,量化对这2种不同光源固化灯的主观感受,并对结果进行统计学分析。结果:实验组总分233,平均9.32;对照组总分276,平均11.04,P<0.05,有统计学意义上的差异。患者对发光二极管光固化灯的牙科焦虑症程度较轻,心理接受度更好。结论:和普通卤光灯相比,老年患者对发光二极管光固化灯心理接受度高,牙科焦虑症程度较轻。Objective： To evaluate the aged patients＇ psychological acceptance for light-emitting diode curing light and halogen light in resin curing treatment. Methods： 160 teeth with wedge-shaped defects （80） or caries （80） were included in this study. Both of wedge-shaped defects teeth and caries teeth were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The patients in experimental group were cured with the light-emitting diode curing light and the patients in control group with halogen light. All the patients filled questionnaires to survey different feeling to the two kinds of curing light. Results： 25 questionnaires were collected, mean score of experimental group was 9.32; and that of control group was 11.04. The difference was statistically significant P〈0.05）. The aged patients had better acceptance and less dental fear for light-emitting diode curing light than halogen light. Conclusion： Compared to halogen light, there is better acceptance and less dental fear for light-emitting diode curing light in patients.

关 键 词：老年人 发光二极管光固化灯 普通卤光灯 牙科焦虑症 

分 类 号：R781.05[医药卫生—口腔医学]