A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of tegaserod in patients from China with chronic constipation  

作　　者：San-Ren Lin Mei-Yun Ke Jin-Yan Luo Yao-Zong Yuan Ji-Yao Wang Shelley diTommaso Verena Walter Jiaqing Huang 

机构地区：[1]The 3rd Hospital, Beijing Medical University, Beijing, China [2]Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing,China [3]The 2nd Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University,Shanxi, China [4]Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China [5]Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China [6]Novartis Pharma AG,Basel, Switzerland [7]Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover,New Jersey, United States

出　　处：《World Journal of Gastroenterology》2007年第5期732-739,共8页世界胃肠病学杂志（英文版）

摘　　要：AIM： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegaserod, 6 mg twice daily （b.i.d.）, in men and women with chronic constipation （CC） from China. METHODS： This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following a 2-wk treatmentfree baseline period, patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod （6 mg b.i.d.） or placebo （b.i.d.） for 4 wk. An analysis of covariance with repeated measures was used to determine the overall effect of treatment for the primary efficacy variable; the change from baseline in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements （CSBMs） during the 4-wk treatment period. Secondary efficacy endpoints included other measures of response in terms of CSBMs, and patients＇ daily and weekly assessment of bowel habits. Safety was also assessed, based on the incidence and severity of adverse events （AEs）. RESULTS： A total of 607 patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod （n = 304） or placebo （n = 303）. Tegaserod treatment resulted in a rapid and significant increase from baseline in the adjusted mean number of CSBMs per week over wk 1-4 compared with placebo （1.39 vs 0.91, P = 0.0002）. A statistically significant difference in favor of tegaserod was also observed for a mean increase ≥ 1 CSBM/wk over wk 1-4 （47.7% vs 35.0%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0018） and for the absolute number of≥ 3 CSBMs/wk over wk 1-4 （25.0% vs 14.5%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0021）. Improvements in other symptoms of CC were also seen in the tegaserod group, including improved stool form and reduced straining. In addition, more patients in the tegaserod group reported satisfactory relief from their constipation symptoms. The frequency and severity of AEs was comparable between tegaserod and placebo groups, with the exception of a greater incidence of diarrhea in patients receiving tegaserod （3.6%） compared with placebo （1.7%）. CONCLUSION： Tecjaserod treatment improved multiple symptoms of CC and was asAIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegaserod, 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), in men and women with chronic constipation (CC) from China. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following a 2-wk treatment-free baseline period, patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod (6 mg b.i.d.) or placebo (b.i.d.) for 4 wk. An analysis of covariance with repeated measures was used to determine the overall effect of treatment for the primary efficacy variable; the change from baseline in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) during the 4-wk treatment period. Secondary efficacy endpoints included other measures of response in terms of CSBMs, and patients’ daily and weekly assessment of bowel habits. Safety was also assessed, based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).RESULTS: A total of 607 patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod (n = 304) or placebo (n = 303). Tegaserod treatment resulted in a rapid and significant increase from baseline in the adjusted mean number of CSBMs per week over wk 1-4 compared with placebo (1.39 vs 0.91, P = 0.0002). A statistically significant difference in favor of tegaserod was also observed for a mean increase ≥ 1 CSBM/wk over wk 1-4 (47.7% vs 35.0%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0018) and for the absolute number of ≥ 3 CSBMs/wk over wk 1-4 (25.0% vs 14.5%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0021). Improvements in other symptoms of CC were also seen in the tegaserod group, including improved stool form and reduced straining. In addition, more patients in the tegaserod group reported satisfactory relief from their constipation symptoms. The frequency and severity of AEs was comparable between tegaserod and placebo groups, with the exception of a greater incidence of diarrhea in patients receiving tegaserod (3.6%) compared with placebo (1.7%).CONCLUSION: Tegaserod treatment improved multiple symptoms of CC and was associated with a favorable safety profile.

关 键 词：Chronic constipation TEGASEROD China Complete spontaneous bowel movement Placebocontrolled STOOL 

分 类 号：R574.62[医药卫生—消化系统]