检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺恒扬[1]
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2007年第1期75-79,共5页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:最高人民检察院2005年度重点科研课题(GJ2005B9)。
摘 要:多年的刑事抗诉司法实践以无可争辩的事实,证明了其在保障司法公正等方面具有不可替代的作用,但是现有刑事抗诉制度也存在提起条件不明确、履行抗诉的程序不完善以及对被害人权益保护功能发挥不足等一系列问题。这些问题的存在已经严重制约了刑事抗诉职权的履行;因此,必须进一步细化刑事抗诉提起的标准,分别按照二审程序抗诉和审判监督程序抗诉的不同特点完善刑事抗诉程序,切实保障刑事被害人的抗诉请求权,增强抗诉请求对检察机关的制约效力,以充分保障其合法权益。The criminal prosecutorial protest is of critical importance to ensuring judicial justice, but there are some defects in current system, such as indefinite premise of instituting an action, unperfected procedure, and the defect of protecting victim' s interest, etc. , by which the power and authority of criminal prosecutorial protest has been restricted. Hence it is imperative to further define the standard of criminal prosecutorial protest, and simultaneously we must improve the procedure of criminal prosecutorial protest according to the different characters of different kinds of criminal prosecutorial protest. In order to protect the victim' s legal rights, the law must protect their appeal rights, and enhance the restriction of the appeal for a protest to the procuratorial organ.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171