行政诉讼中的事实审查与法律审查——以司法审查强度为中心  

Facts Judgment and Law Judgment in Administrative Litigation

作　　者：王锴[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2007年第1期103-108,共6页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：行政诉讼具有不同于刑事诉讼、民事诉讼的构造,行政诉讼除了具有保障人权的基本价值外,还不得不重视权力分立的价值,即在行政诉讼注重司法权对行政权的控制和审查的同时,也要防止司法权对行政权的过度侵入,从而妨碍行政权的独立行使,这就是司法审查强度的问题。我国《行政诉讼法》应当重视区分事实问题和法律问题,并进行不同强度的司法审查。The structure of administrative litigation is different from that of criminal litigation and civil litigation. The fundamental value of administrative litigation is not only to protect human rights, but also to keep the separation of powers. That is to say, on the one hand, administrative litigation focuses on the judicial control on the executive power. One the other hand, it prevents the judicial power from trespassing the executive power. In conclusion, it is the problem of the intensity of judicial review. Administrative litigation law should attach importance to the difference of fact issue and law issue, and correspondingly establish a system placing different intensity of judicial review according to different issues.

关 键 词：事实问题 法律问题 行政裁量 不确定法律概念 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]