辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭证据、伪造证据、妨害作证罪的基本问题分析  

A Preliminary Analysis of the Crime of Destroying or Forging Evidenceor or Interfering with Testimony by Defenders or Law-agents

作　　者：蔡军[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学现代法制研究所,河南开封475001

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2007年第2期116-119,123,共5页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：当前,对刑法第306条规定的辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭证据、伪造证、妨害作证罪设置合理性受到众多质疑,主要归结为两点:一是在立法技术上,犯罪主体具有特定指向性,罪状具有模糊性和宽泛性,第306条与其他条文出现竞合;二是在立法价值上,本罪设置具有职业歧视性,并且违背立法理念。对这些问题的解决有三:废除本罪或者修订主体和罪状;建立和完善律师惩戒制度;转变观念,确实保障律师权利。Presently, the Rationality of Setting up the Crime of Destroying or Forging Evidenceor or Interfering with Testimony by Defenders or Law - agents is been questioning by more and more people, The question can be mainly concluded to two points： one of questions is that, in the legislation technology , the subject of the crime has specificly objection, and the indictment has fuzziness and broadness, the article 306 of the penal code competes gathers with other articles ; the other question is that, in the legislation value, the crime has the discrimination of occupation, and violates the legislative concept. There are three solutions to resolve these question ： abolishing the crime or revising the body of the crime and revising the indictment of the crime; establishing and consummating the disciplinary punishment system to the attorney ; transformating the idea to the attorney, and safeguarding the right of attorney.

关 键 词：罪体结构 立法技术 立法价值 律师 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]