检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学口腔医学研究所南京医科大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓科,南京210029
出 处:《口腔医学》2007年第3期143-145,共3页Stomatology
摘 要:目的体外实验比较不同器械预备根管后连续波热牙胶根管充填技术的根尖封闭能力。方法离体双根管上颌前磨牙随机分为机用ProFile预备组和不锈钢K锉预备组,分别采用连续波热牙胶充填技术和冷侧压法进行根管充填,用染料渗透法和透明标本法测量根尖微渗漏,评价各组根尖封闭能力。结果各组根尖微渗漏距离无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论连续波热牙胶充填技术与冷牙胶侧方加压充填技术的根尖封闭能力无显著性差异;对直根管和轻度弯曲的根管,不同器械根管预备后其根管充填效果无明显影响。Objective To evaluate the apical sealability of different combinations of root canal preparation and continuous wave of condensation technique in vitro. Methods Twenty-four extracted maxillary premolars with two canals were randomly divided into four equal groups of ten canals,instrumenting and ohturating according to different techniques. Apical microleakage was determined using dye penetration and clearing technique,and measured by stereomicroscope. Results No statistical differences were found between any of the preparation/falling combinations in terms of apical microleakage( P 〉 0.05). Conclusions Apical sealing ability between continuous wave technique and cold lateral compaction was showing no significant differences; apical sealing ability was not influenced by preparation technique for straight or slight-waved canals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.136.24