检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周保军[1] 宋伟庆[1] 闫庆辉[1] 蔡建辉[1] 刘津[1] 张国建[1] 段国强[1] 任鹏涛[1]
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第二医院胃肠外科,河北石家庄050000
出 处:《中国内镜杂志》2007年第3期229-231,234,共4页China Journal of Endoscopy
基 金:河北省科技攻关项目(No:052761001D-26)资助
摘 要:目的探讨腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术的可行性、安全性及优越性。方法将2004年12月~2006年3月收治的可以行保肛手术直肠癌患者60例,随机分腹腔镜组和传统开腹组进行手术,对其临床资料进行比较分析。结果腹腔镜组29例,开腹手术28例。腹腔镜组术中出血量、手术切口长度、术后疼痛评分VAS、恢复肠道功能的时间和下床活动时间[(69±48)mL、(5.1±1.5)cm、(5.3±2.1)、(31±11)h和(2.5±1.2)d)]明显低于开腹手术组[(172±67)mL、(19.8±4.7)cm、(9.2±2.9)、(82±13)h和(7.2±2.8)d],腹腔镜组手术时间(172±36)min明显长于开腹手术组(142±47)min,两组之间差异均存在显著性,P<0.01。两组在肠段切除长度、肿块距下切缘距离和淋巴结清扫范围方面比较,差异无显著性,P>0.05。开腹手术组术中肉眼血尿、术后切口感染发生机会多于腹腔镜组,两组吻合口瘘的发生率基本相同。结论腹腔镜直肠癌根治手术创伤小,恢复快,安全可靠,对于能够按照TME原则进行手术保肛的直肠癌患者,能够取得与开腹手术同样的肿瘤根治性效果。[Objective] To evaluate the feasibility, safety and advantage of laparoseopic anterior resection for rectal cancer with anal sphincter preservation. [Method] From December 2004 to March 2006, 29 patients with rectal cancer underwent anterior resection, while 28 patients received open procedure, the clinical data were collected and compared. [Results] The mean operative blood loss, the length of incision, the grade of pain after operation, the resuming time of bowel function, the time of resuming early activity [(69±48) mL, (5.1±1.5) cm, (5.3±2.1), (31± 11) h, (2.5±1.2) d] in laparoseopic group were significantly lower than [(142±47) min, (19.8±4.7) cm, (9.2±2.9), (82± 13) h, (7.2±2.8) d] in open group. P 〈0.01. The mean operating time in laparoseopic group (172±36) rain was significantly longer than (142±470) rain open group (P 〈0.01). No significant difference were detected between two group in specimen length, distal margin and lymph node harvest. P 〉0.05. Vesical hematuria and infection in incision are more likely to take place in open group than in laparoscopic group. The rates of anastomotic leakage was almost same in two group. [Conclusions] Laparoseopic surgery is feasible, safe and minimally invasive technique for rectal cancer with anal sphincter preservation, which can get the same radical effect of TME compared with the traditional open procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15