对美国比较文学独立学科性质一种新说的质疑  

Query to a New Statement of Defining the Nature of Comparative Literature as an Individual Discipline

作　　者：孙景尧[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学 人文与传播学院,上海200234

出　　处：《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2007年第2期82-87,81,共7页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：每十年一度的美国比较文学协会的最近报告中提出,比较文学“学科的独立性有赖于”其研究对象的“特性与关系”。文章论证指出,这是对比较文学学科性质的“进一步、退两步”的新说,论文通过对国际学界比较文学学科理论的反思,进一步论述了比较文学学科的三要素:跨界的文学关系——研究对象,跨界的视野——“知识装备”,与之“适合”的研究方法——可比性学理逻辑假设,这三者共同组成了互存互动的既充分又必要的条件,从而使比较文学成为与众不同的一门文学研究独立学科。A recent report of the decennial conference of American Comparative Literature Association argues that ＂the independence of comparative literature as a discipline depends on the characteristic and the interrelation＂ of its dimensions. This paper attempts to contend that the above -mentioned new argument means ＂one step forward, two steps backward＂ in defining the nature of comparative literature as a discipline. Reflecting on the theories advocated by our partisans, the author examines the three important elements in the discipline： interdisciplinary literary relations as its dimensions, interdisciplinary perspective as its equipment and logical hypothesis of comparability as its proper approach. These three elements, which coexist and interact, jointly constitute the necessary and sufficient conditions of the discipline, thus enabling comparative literature to become a distinctive independent discipline.

关 键 词：比较文学 研究对象 学科性质 研究方法 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]