检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学南海校区(学院)心理咨询研究中心,佛山528225 [2]华南师范大学教育科学学院心理系,广州510631
出 处:《心理与行为研究》2007年第1期41-46,共6页Studies of Psychology and Behavior
摘 要:在青少年攻击性理论与当代青少年攻击性表现的基础上,结合国外的研究成果以及专家评定,通过探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,编制了一个适合青少年攻击性评估的问卷。结果发现:(1)自编的“青少年攻击性问卷”由攻击性行为、攻击性认知和攻击性情绪3个分量表构成。攻击性行为分量表由口头攻击、身体攻击、自我发泄3个维度构成;攻击性认知分量表由敌对、恶意、报复心理3个维度构成;攻击性情绪分量表由易怒性、冲动、缺乏自我控制能力3个维度构成;(2)问卷的内部一致性系数和维度与分量表、总分以及分量表与总分的相关系数达到显著水平,量表的内容效度、结构效度、实证效度较高。The purpose of the research is to develop the Adolescent Aggressiveness Questionnaire (AAQ) fit for Chinese adolescents based on adolescent aggressiveness theory, adolescent aggressiveness expression, research results of foreign countries, and expert assessing. The dimensions and structure of the AAQ were examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) . At the same time, the characteristic of adolescent aggressiveness and the relation between adolescent aggressiveness and family background variables, popularity in class were examined. The results showed: 1) AAQ was made up with aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition and aggressive emotions. Aggressive behavior had three factors: verbal aggression, physical aggression and self-aggression. 2) The internal consistency reliabilities (Cronbach's alphas) and the relation between factors and scales, questionnaire, and the relations between scales and questionnaire were summarized. The content validity, structure validity, and concrete validity of the AAQ were examined. The findings showed reliabilities and validities were adequate to excellent.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38