TCT与巴氏细胞学在宫颈癌筛查中的对比研究  被引量:29

Comparison study of TCT and Pap smear cytology in the screening of cervical cancer

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李琴艳[1] 杨庆忠[1] 付雯[1] 

机构地区:[1]江西省妇幼保健院病理细胞室,330006

出  处:《中国妇幼保健》2007年第9期1173-1174,共2页Maternal and Child Health Care of China

摘  要:目的:评价ThinPrep宫颈液基细胞学(TCT)检查在宫颈癌筛查中的敏感性和价值。方法:回顾2500例体检病人液基细胞学诊断及2500例门诊病人普通涂片诊断,细胞学诊断采用TBS标准,以组织学活检作对照。结果;液基细胞学和普通细胞学分别检出鳞状细胞癌(SCC)100.00%、83.33%,鳞状上皮内高度病变(HSIL)97.22%、84.06%,鳞状上皮内低度病变(LSIL)77.91%、68.75%,两者诊断SCC的准确率分别为80.00%、66.67%,诊断HSIL的准确率分别为73.61%、62.32%。结论:ThinPrep液基细胞学检查敏感性高于巴氏细胞学,特别是诊断HSIL以上。Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical value of liquid -based cytology (Thip -Prep Cytology Test) for the screening of cervical cancer. Methods: The cytology and biopsy results in 2 500 normal persons and 2 500 patients in outpatient were reviewed. Results: The accuracy rates of diagnosis between Thip- Prep cytology and Pap smear were SCC 100%, 83%, HSIL 97%, 84%, LSIL 78%, 69%. The accuracy diagnosis rates in HSIL were 75% and 62%. Conclusion: The diagnosis Thip - Prep cytology test is more sensitive than it in Pap smear, especially in HSIL and above.

关 键 词:液基细胞 宫颈癌 筛查 

分 类 号:R737.33[医药卫生—肿瘤]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象