四种尿沉渣检查方法的比较  

Comparison four methods of urinary sediment

作　　者：白垚[1] 程大林[1] 刘劲松[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院检验科,重庆400016

出　　处：《重庆医科大学学报》2007年第5期518-520,共3页Journal of Chongqing Medical University

摘　　要：目的:对DiaSys(R/S 2003)尿沉渣定量分析工作站法、Fast Read_(102)定量尿沉渣计数板法、改良牛鲍氏血细胞计数池法和UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪四种尿沉渣检测方法进行比较和评价。方法:尿液标本经标准化方法处理后,分别用上述四种方法进行定量计数分析,并比较结果。结果:四种方法重复性均较好;以Fast Read_(102)定量尿沉渣计数板法为标准,仅UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪法有显著性差异,P<0.05;且UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪法的参考范围也与其余3组不同。结论:UF-100全自动尿沉渣分析仪对于尿沉渣检测的筛检具有重要价值,但并不能完全替代显微镜检查。Objective：We comparison and evaluation four methods of urinary sediment, there are DiaSys （R/S 2003）urinary sediment quantitative analysis workstation,Fast Read102 urinary sediment quantitative counting plate,improved blood cell counting ehamber,UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer. Methods：Treated the urine sample with standard operation process, quantitative analyzed the sample with four methods as above,then compared the result and evaluated those methods. Results：we got good reproducibility with each method,compared to the result of Read102 urinary sediment quantitative counting plate,only that of UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer had difference significantly,P〈0.05;and the reference range existed significant difference too,compared with others methods. Conclusion：UF-100 automatic urinary sediment analyzer had important role in the scanning test of urinary sediment,but it can not replace the manual microscopy inspection.

关 键 词：尿液 尿沉渣分析 尿沉渣分析仪 

分 类 号：R446.1[医药卫生—诊断学]