寻找疯癫“言说”的可能性:从考古学到系谱学的转换——读福柯《疯癫与文明》  

Searching for the Possibility of the Madness Discourse: Archeology to Genealogy——A review of Foucault’s Madness and Civilization

作　　者：韩平[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学理论法学研究中心,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《河北法学》2007年第5期6-10,共5页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：主要探讨《疯癫与文明》中对于疯癫言说的可能性的问题,认为福柯通过疯癫的历史间断性和真理建构性的角度为疯癫言说的产生开启了大门,但在考古学时期作为“话语实践”的“严肃言语行动”的理论分析面对德里达的质疑需要重新思考。因此,试图从福柯理论转换的角度来为疯癫的言说可能性指出走向,认为在系谱学时期和性史的研究中,福柯通过对既包含历史的参与者与言说者的二重身份的“当下”历史的现代性探讨,和在性史中对于“自我技术”的探讨,为疯癫的言说提供理论上的可能性。The theme of this paper is to discuss the possibility of the madness discourse, and I think Foueauk opens the door for the madness discourse by the interruption of the history and the construction of the truth. At the same time, when the theory of the serious competence of the discursive praetiee in the time of archeology affronts the Derrida＇s oppugn, we should considerate it again. Therefore, I try to point the way of the possibility of the madness discourse from the per- speetlve of the turning of Foueault＇s theory. So, my point is that Foueault provides a theoretical way to deal with this difficult problem in the genealogy and sexuality history researching time, when he probes into the modernity of present history including the historical actor and historical interpreter, and analyzes the self-technology in the sexuality history.

关 键 词：疯癫言说 话语实践 当下历史 

分 类 号：B712[哲学宗教—外国哲学]