两种方法治疗慢性浅表性胃炎疗效比较  

Effect of Two Methods in Chronic Superficial Gastritis

作　　者：李来生[1] 刘清源[1] 孙斌[1] 李红满[1] 刘林源[1] 王玮[1] 

机构地区：[1]武警河南总队医院,郑州市450052

出　　处：《医药论坛杂志》2007年第4期17-18,共2页Journal of Medical Forum

摘　　要：目的比较应用阿莫西林、奥美拉唑、果胶铋与应用阿莫西林和果胶铋两种方法治疗慢性浅表性胃炎的临床疗效。方法将215例研究对象随机分为阿莫西林、奥美拉唑、果胶铋组(108例)为实验组与阿莫西林和果胶铋组(107例)为对照组,连续服药2周,观察临床症状的缓解情况。结果实验组总有效率为84%与对照组总有效率为83%比较,治疗2周末疗效差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论阿莫西林、奥美拉唑、果胶铋疗法与阿莫西林、果胶铋疗法均对慢性浅表性胃炎有效,而阿莫西林、果胶铋疗法价格较便宜,可优先选用。Objective To compare the effect of amoxicillin, omepraole and bismuth pectin and the effect of amoxicillin and bismuth pectin On chronic superficial gastritis. Methods 215 cases with chronic gastritis were randomly divided into two groups, the group of amoxicillin, omeprazole, and bismuth pectin（ 108 cases）and the group of amoxicillin, and bismuth pectin （107 cases）. To observe the change of symptom after treatment of two weeks. Results After treatment of two weeks, there were no singificantly difference in two group（ effect rate 84% vs 83%, P 〉 0. 05 ）. Conclusion Both the method of amoxicilln, omeprazole, and bismuth pectin and the method of amoxicillin, and bismuth pectin are effective in the treatment of chronic superficial gastritis, but the method of amoxicillin and bismuth pectin has a cheaper price.

关 键 词：慢性浅表性胃炎 药物治疗 幽门螺旋杆菌 

分 类 号：R573.31[医药卫生—消化系统]