今本大、小戴《礼记》编者误说清理  

To criticize several false viewpoints on the editors of The Rites by Da Dai and Xiao Dai

作　　者：丁进[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学中文系,安徽蚌埠233041

出　　处：《古籍整理研究学刊》2007年第2期4-10,共7页Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies

基　　金：安徽省教育厅社科项目2006SK117阶段性成果。

摘　　要：大、小戴《礼记》为戴德、戴圣所编,从《汉书》到孔颖达《礼记正义》都有定论。但自宋代开始,历代均有学者或对今本《礼记》为二戴所编表示怀疑,或提出“新说”。这些怀疑和“新说”虽然大部分遭到前人的否定,但他们提出的有些证据仍然没有被驳倒;近人洪业提出的几个疑点尚未获得令人满意的解答;还有一些学人未能吸收前人的研究成果,仍然在使用被证明为错误的说法。因此有必要对古今人在这个问题上的种种误说进行清理。The Rites by Da dai and Xiao dai that be edited by Dai de and Dai sheng is a last word from Han Dynasty to Tang Dynasty. But scholars from Song Dynasty to now express their suspicions or put forward new opinions. However the evidences they put forward have not been confuted completely, though their must suspicions and new opinions have been denied. Several doubtful points put forward by Hong ye recently are still in the scale and a few of scholars still follow the mistakes. Therefore, the false views on this question must been clean up.

关 键 词：礼记 戴德 戴圣 

分 类 号：K103[历史地理—历史学]