检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:艾明[1]
机构地区:[1]广东警官学院,广东广州510232
出 处:《贵州警官职业学院学报》2007年第2期76-82,共7页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
摘 要:在现代化犯罪视野中审视各国刑事诉讼制度的改革与发展,可以得知,在现代化初级阶段,由于面临现代化犯罪大潮的压力,各国刑事诉讼制度的发展大体上首先是以犯罪控制为基本价值定位的。随着现代化的逐步深入,一国刑事诉讼制度中犯罪控制与人权保障的动态比例关系会发生微妙的变化。以这种历史考察为依据,对有学者以“底限正义”作为评判标准,得出我国刑事诉讼制度扭曲和变形的判断、“底限正义”具有元规则地位、一国刑事诉讼制度改革必须遵照“底限正义”的“逻辑优先性”和“绝对要求性”进行等观点可以进行批驳。By reviewing many countries" reforms and development of the criminal proceeding systems in the vision of modernization crimes, we find that in the primary stage of modernization, under the pressure of arising modernization crimes, crime control remained the value position of the criminal proceeding syslems in many countries. With the modernization progressing, the ratios of erime control to human rights guarantee in these countries" eriminal proceeding systems have slightly changed. Based on historical review, this paper refutes a scholar, who, based on the criterion of "Bottom-line Justice", made some judgments that China's criminal proceeding system was distorted: "Bottom-line Justice" shouht occupy the position of haste rule: the reform on criminal proceeding system must ahide by "logic priority" and "absolute request", etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.198.25