检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床外科杂志》2007年第4期268-269,共2页Journal of Clinical Surgery
摘 要:目的比较手术结合瘤腔局部缓释化疗和手术结合静脉化疗治疗脑胶质瘤的效果。方法回顾分析我院2003年2月至2005年4月间胶质瘤病例48例,其中手术结合瘤腔局部缓释化疗治疗胶质瘤20例,设为A组,手术结合静脉化疗治疗胶质瘤28例,设为B组,分别比较两组有效率、中位生存期、1年控制率。结果A、B两组有效率分别为85.0%和53.6%,中位生存时间分别为(49±19.75)周和(36±13.96)周,1年肿瘤控制率分别为85.0%和57.1%,三种指标两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论手术结合瘤腔缓释化疗比手术结合静脉化疗获得了更为满意的疗效。Objective To compare the curative effectiveness of surgical operation plus sustained - release chemotherapy (SRCT) vs surgical operation plus transvenous chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with malignant Cerebral gliomas (MCG). Methods Between February 2003 and April 2005,48 eases of MCG were divided into two groups: group A (20 cases) treated with SRCT after operation and group B (28 cases) treated with transvenous chemotherapy after operation. The curative effectiveness, the median survival time and the 1 - year survival rate between the two groups were compared. Results The effectual rate in group A and group B was 85.0 % and 53.6 % respectively. The median survival time in group A and group B was (49 ± 19.75) weeks and (36 ±13.96) weeks respectively. The 1 - year survival rate in group A and group B was 85.0 % and 57.1% respectively. There were significant differences in above parameters between two groups ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The method of operation plus SRCT is more effective than that of operation plus transvenous chemotherapy in MCG.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147