检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学基础医学部计算机教研室,重庆400038 [2]第三军医大学人体解剖学教研室重庆市计算医学研究所,重庆400038
出 处:《第三军医大学学报》2007年第9期840-842,共3页Journal of Third Military Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨不同客户机规模的分布式并行计算对数字化人体图像重采样时间的影响。方法将计算机分为1个串行计算组与5个并行计算组,对同一个数字化人体数据集重采样生成冠状面与矢状面图像,比较各组重采样时客户机与服务器的处理时间,以及并行计算加速比。结果①并行计算组与串行计算组比较,客户机重采样时间均显著减少(P<0.01)。②16台客户机组与8台客户机组、24台客户机组与16台客户机组比较,客户机重采样时间均显著减少(P<0.01),但32台客户机组与24台客户机组、40台客户机组与32台客户机组比较,客户机重采样时间无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论分布式并行计算能够大幅度减少数字化人体数据集重采样生成冠状面与矢状面图像的时间,但串行处理和通信开销制约了进一步并行化的规模。Objective To explore the effect of distributed parallel-computing on the time of resampling of digitized human with different amounts of client. Methods Computers were randomly divided into one group of serial-computing and five groups of parallel-computing, and the same data of digitized human was resampled by each group. The resampling time of clients and server in each group, speedup of parallel-computing were compared. Results Compared with the group of serial-computing, the time of resampling of the groups of parallel-computing decreased greatly ( P 〈 0.01 ). Compared with the group of 8 clients, the time of resampling of the group of 16 clients decreased greatly (P 〈 0.01 ). Compared with the group of 16 clients, the time of resampling of the group of 24 clients decreased greatly (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion With distributed parallel-computing for resampling transverse sectional anatomical data from digitized human, the resampling time decreases greatly, but serial processing and communication restrict further parallel processing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.42.14