检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《江西教育学院学报》2007年第2期18-22,共5页Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education
基 金:江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目<我国未决羁押制度的实证研究>(编号:Fx0601)的阶段性成果
摘 要:西方法治国家对未决羁押普遍实行司法审查,并且体现诉讼三角结构的特点,因此,该制度能较好地保护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法权益。而我国未决羁押审查的非司法化加之其他配套制度的缺乏,导致在司法实践中侵犯犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法权益的事件时有发生。因此完善该制度,应从改革现行强制措施体系入手,实行羁押与逮捕分离,并且在羁押审查程序中引入司法审查,即由人民法院采取听证的形式行使羁押的决定权。Judicial review is normally carried over the unconvicted detention in the western countries ruled by law and it embodies the triangle-structured features of procedure. Therefore, the system can well protect the human rights of criminal suspects and defendants. But the non-justice of this system and the lack of other supplementary systems lead to the frequent occurrence of violation of criminal suspects and defendants' rights. So, it's necessary to improve this system by reforming the current compulsive measures, separating detention from arrest and carrying out judicial review during detention review proceeding, that is, it's the People's Court that exerts the decisive power of detention by holding a hearing on detention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38