霍耐特与批判理论的“政治伦理转向”  

作　　者：王凤才[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心,上海200433

出　　处：《现代哲学》2007年第3期49-54,共6页Modern Philosophy

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(05JA720017)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在几十年历史演变过程中,法兰克福学派批判理论经历了三期发展:第一期发展侧重于批判理论建构与工业文明批判;第二期发展侧重于批判理论重建与现代性批判;第三期发展完成了批判理论的“政治伦理转向”。如果说,哈贝马斯话语伦理学、商谈政治理论,意味着批判理论的“政治伦理转向”一定程度实现;那么,霍耐特承认理论及其多元正义构想,则标志着批判理论的“政治伦理转向”最终完成。尽管霍氏徘徊于批判理论与后批判理论、理想主义与现实主义、一元主义与多元主义之间,但是最终从批判理论走向了后批判理论。During several decades＇evolvement, Frankfurt School＇s critical theory experiences three phases＇development： in the first phase, it emphasizes on construction of critical theory; in the second phase, it emphasizes on reconstruction of critical theory and critic of modernism; in the third phase, it accomplishes the political-ethical turning of critical theory. If Habermas＇s discussethics and deliberative political theory indicates that the political-ethical turning of critical theory is achieved to an extent, his theory of recognition and his visualization of multi-justice symbols that the political-ethical turning of critical theory has been achieved completely. Though Honneth hesitates between critical theory and post-critical theory, idealism and realism, monism and pluralism, he has finally achieved the turning from critical theory to post-critical theory.

关 键 词：霍耐特 批判理论三期发展 政治伦理转向 后批判理论 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论]