检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200433
出 处:《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》2007年第4期45-52,共8页Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
摘 要:宪政的本质是对国家权力的限制,以保障个人的基本权利。人的基本权利通过宪法和法律来表达,也需要宪法和法律予以保障。在限制和剥夺人的基本权利的种种方式中,刑事惩罚最为严重。因此,一方面,在宪法上明确个人基本权利的同时,需要设定无罪推定等保障机制,奠定辩护权的根基,另一方面,需要在刑事诉讼法中规定辩护权的具体行使方式,保障辩护权的行使效果。在现代宪政国家,辩护制度在宪法和刑事诉讼法中力求良性互动。因此,我国辩护制度的完善,不能局限于刑事诉讼法,还必须关注宪政化进程。The nature of the constitutionalism is to restrict the gove tal rights. The fundamental rights are carried out and protected by strict and deprive the individual fundamental rights, the criminal p rnment power to ensure the individual fundamenthe constitution and laws. Among the ways to reunishment is the most serious and violent one. So on one hand, it is needed to build up the safeguard mechanism such as the presumption of the innocence, making it the basis of the advocacy system ;on the other hand,it' s necessary to prescribe the way in which the right to defense will be carried out in the criminal procedure law, insure the implement of the right. In the modern constitutional states ,the advocacy system in the constitutional law and the criminal procedure law share the salutary interaction. The perfection of the advocacy system in our country needs not only the support from the criminal procedure law but also the improvement of the constitutionalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.109.137