检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳瑞文
机构地区:[1]蚌埠市中级人民法院刑二庭,安徽蚌埠233000
出 处:《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第3期74-76,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
摘 要:理论界一般认为,盗窃罪的客体是公私财物的所有权,即所有权说。但在实践中,所有权说遇到许多该学说无法解决的具体问题。作者根据个别学者提出的侵犯财产罪新的犯罪客体理论,分析了实践中盗窃案件的多种特殊情况,认为该客体理论比所有权说更具优越性。Generally speaking, the object of larceny is the public or private ownership in the theoretic area .This is the so-called theory of ownership. However, this theory could not deal with many specific problems in real life. Some scholar put forward the new theory of the criminal object of larceny. According to this new theory, the author of this article analyses the various special cases in practice, and thus concludes that the new theory is superior to the old one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147