对抗与和谐——谈法官的释明权  

Confrontation and Harmony——On the judge's interpretation right

作　　者：陶建国[1] 何秉群[2] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学,湖南湘潭411105 [2]河北广播电视大学,河北石家庄050071

出　　处：《河北法学》2007年第8期147-151,159,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：释明权制度对修正辩论主义的形骸化、明确当事人之间的诉讼关系,进而实现公平地解决纠纷发挥着重要作用。法官的释明包括消极的释明和积极的释明,释明内容主要为请求内容的释明、请求原因的释明、证明促使以及法律观点的指明等。目前,在如何行使释明权以及行使程度和范围等方面还没有一个统一的标准,一些问题主要靠判例来解决。我国的民事诉讼中尚未引入释明权制度,因此,对该制度的探讨和研究具有一定的现实意义。Interpretation right system plays an important role in amending the formalization of debate doctrine, confirming parties＇s litigation, and actualizing fair resolution of disputes.Judge＇s interpretation right includes passive interpretation and active interpretation. Its content includes interpretation of the plea, interpretation of the plea＇ s cause, certification request and show of law view. At present, there is no uniform standard on the exertion and its degree and scope. Problems are mainly decided according to precedent. Interpretation system has not been introduced into our civil procedure. So the study on the interpretation right is of significance in reality.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 释明权 释明义务 辩论主义 诉讼请求 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]