检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学心理学系,西安710062 [2]华东师范大学特殊教育学系,上海200062
出 处:《中国特殊教育》2007年第6期49-54,共6页Chinese Journal of Special Education
基 金:教育科学"十一五"规划教育部青年专项课题"基于认知比较范式的聋童视知觉加工能力与补偿教育策略研究"(立项号:EHA060208)前期研究成果之一;;上海市"特殊教育学"重点学科的资助。
摘 要:本研究选取15名聋人与15名听力正常人被试,在两种刺激图对呈现时间条件下,通过考察其对拓扑性质等价和拓扑性质差异图对的反应,对聋人与听力正常人拓扑性质差异的知觉敏感性进行比较研究。研究结果表明:(1)总体上,被试对拓扑性质等价和拓扑性质差异图对的反应不存在显著差异,聋人与听力正常人对刺激图对的反应不存在显著差异。(2)对聋人来说,刺激图对长时间和短时间呈现的反应不存在显著差异;而对听力正常人来说,刺激图对长时间呈现的反应则优于短时间呈现。Using 15 deaf people and 15 normal- hearing people as subjects, and two different types of presentation duration, we study subjects' reaction to figures with topological difference and non - topological differenee. We then compare the hearing- impaired and normal - hearing subjects in terms of their poreeption sensitivity to typological differences. The results show that: (1) In general, there is no significant difference between the perception judgment of topological difference figures and non - topological difference figures. There is no significant difference between the deaf and normal - hearing people in response to the figures. (2) For the hearing - impaired, there is no significant difference regarding the perception judgment of figures presented in long and short duration. However, normal - hearing subjects do better in the perception judgment of figures presented in long duration than in short duration.
分 类 号:G762[文化科学—特殊教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117