检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙会艳[1] 黄富银[2] 蔡伟雄[2] 汤涛[2] 李强[1]
机构地区:[1]苏州大学基础医学院,江苏苏州215123 [2]司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所,上海200063
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2007年第3期34-36,共3页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
摘 要:民事诉讼中,当事人是诉讼主体之一,当法院怀疑当事人存在精神状态异常,考虑到他们是否具有主体资格时,可委托鉴定机构对当事人进行精神疾病司法鉴定,并评定其有无诉讼行为能力,以此来维护精神病人及各相关主体的合法权益。本文结合民事诉讼能力的研究现状,首先阐述其概念,分析民事行为能力与民事诉讼能力的区别,然后分析其分级方面存在的争议,最后阐述民事诉讼能力应当的等级划分。Parties are major participants in civil litigations. When a court suspects that a person concerned is in abnormal mental state, considering if they are have main body qualification, it may entrust evaluator of forensic psychiatric evaluation to evaluate and determine if the peron has civil litigation ability, in order to maintian the lawft,interests of psychiatric patients and correlated parties . This article, when presenting the status quo of reseach on civil litigation ability, expounds, its concept first, analyzes the difference between civil litigation abilityand civil capacity ,Secondly, it analyzes the dispute in its grading ,and finaUy illustrates the proper grading of civil litigation ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222