检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:JIANG Yun-wei
机构地区:[1]Law School of Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
出 处:《US-China Law Review》2007年第5期65-71,共7页美中法律评论(英文版)
摘 要:The bias of expert witnesses has developed into a serious problem in the adversarial system. There have already existed some mechanisms to control experts' dishonesty, including the market mechanism, cross-examination and perjury. However, the effectiveness of these measures is suspect. To control bias, some more useful devices are necessary. In the proposals which have been suggested, three points are important. The first one is changing from a system of party-hired experts to court-appointed ones. The second one is the judicial fine, where the court punishes dishonest expert testimony. The third one is using professional discipline to punish dishonest experts. This article examines the merits and flaws of each orooosal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49