检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李涛[1] 苏炳光[2] 凌华晃[2] 蔡茂德[2] 吴祥成[2]
机构地区:[1]广东医学院2004级硕士研究生2班,广东湛江524023 [2]高州市人民医院肿瘤化疗科,广东高州525200
出 处:《中华肿瘤防治杂志》2007年第13期1019-1020,共2页Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:观察2周CHOP(环磷酰胺+阿霉素+长春新碱+强的松)方案和CHOEP方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤(Non-Hodgkin’slymphoma,NHL)的有效性和毒副反应。将51例NHL患者随机分3组,分别采用标准CHOP、CHOEP和CHOP-14方案治疗并观察疗效和毒副反应。51例中CR29例,PR16例,总有效率(OR)88.2%(CR+PR),各组的CR和OR分别为50.0%和85.0%(CHOP),56.0%和87.5%(CHOEP),66.7%和93.3%(CHOP-14)。CHOEP和CHOP-14对NHL的疗效比标准CHOP有提高的趋势,但各组之间CR和OR差异无统计学意义,各组之间毒副反应相似。CHOEP和CHOP-14均可作为NHL安全有效的化疗方案。To observe the effect and toxicity of biweekly CHOP regimen and CHOEP regimen in the treatment of Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Fifty-one case of NHL were randomly allocated into three groups: Patients respectively received standard CHOP, CHOEP and CHOP-14 regimen, we observe the effect and toxicity. Of 50 cases,29 received CR, 16 received PR, Overall response (OR) rates were 88.2% (CR+PR) ,CR and OR were 50.0% and 85.0% ,respectively, for CHOP, 56.0% and 87.5%, respectively, for CHOEP and 66.7% and 93.3%, respectively, for CHOP-14,there were a good tendency for patients treated with CHOEP and CHOP-14 regimen, while there were no significantly difference for CR ,OR and toxicity among three groups. CHOEP and CHOP-14 should be considered safe and effective chemotherapy regimens for patients with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30