王冰对《素问》经文改动之探讨  

Exploration to the Changes of “Plain Questions” Brought about by Wang Bing

作　　者：乔海法[1] 李红芹[2] 张灿玾 

机构地区：[1]山东中医药大学,山东250014 [2]济南中医药大学,山东250012

出　　处：《中国医药学报》1997年第1期24-28,共5页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：运用文献研究中常用的比较法,通过与《太素》、《甲乙经》等相关资料的比较研究,似可认为,王冰次注《素问》与《太素》、《甲乙经》等的差异:主要当系祖本不同所致,不得尽归罪于王冰,王冰改动经文当不会太多。Through comparative study of 'Taisu', A-B Classic of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, and some related materials by using frequently comparative method in literature study. It may be considered that the different versions were the main causes for resulting in the difference between 'Plain Questions' annotated by Wang Bing and 'Taisu', and A-B Classic of Acupuncture and Moxibustion. So the changes of 'Plain Questions' can't impute to Wang Bing who didn't change too many of the content.

关 键 词：素问 王冰 文献研究 

分 类 号：R221[医药卫生—中医基础理论]