检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛飞[1] 王美青[1] 李晓峰[1] 刘小勇[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学口腔医学院,陕西西安710032
出 处:《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》2007年第6期348-350,共3页Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基 金:国家自然科学基金国际合作资助项目(30540130469)
摘 要:目的:探讨错主要类别(安氏错及覆覆盖关系)在颞下颌关节紊乱病(temporomandib-ulardisorders,TMD)组与正畸病人组间有无明显差别。方法:颞下颌关节紊乱病相关症状为主诉的369例(TMD组),要求正畸治疗的933例(MAL组),对两组人群同年龄、同性别配对,取研究模观察。结果:①两组比较安氏错类型无明显差异(P>0.05);②TMD组深覆病例明显高于正畸治疗组,而前牙对刃、反,后牙反的比例均明显低于错组(P<0.05)。结论:深覆与TMD关系比较密切。AIM: To investigate whether there is significant difference on the main kind of malocclusion ( Angles classification of malocclusion and the relationship of over - jet and over - bit) between temporomandibular dis- orders (TMD)patients and orthodontic patients. METHODS: 369 TMD patients and 933 orthodontic patients visited in our hospital were included. Patients from the two groups were paired with same age and belong to same sex. Study cast were obtained for all 1102 subjects. RESULTS: (1)There is no significant difference on Angles classification of malocclusion between the two groups (P 〉 0.05 ) ;(2)The cases of deep over -jet in TMD group were significantly higher than those in the orthodontic group. While the ratios of anterior edge to edge bite .cross bite and posterior cross bite in the former group was significantly lower than those in the later group (P 〈 0.05 ). CONCLUSION: The relationship between deep over- jet and TMD is close.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30