检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中农业大学水产学院华中农业大学农业动物遗传育种与繁殖教育部重点实验室,武汉430070 [2]亚洲理工大学环境资源与发展学院
出 处:《淡水渔业》2007年第4期52-56,共5页Freshwater Fisheries
基 金:Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program;USAID(No.LAG-G-00-96-90015-00)
摘 要:利用微生物植酸酶分别对3种植物性原料(豆粕、玉米蛋白粉、小麦)进行酶处理,研究不同浓度植酸酶作用下3种植物性原料中植酸磷含量的变化。3种原料分别有6组处理(植酸酶对照0 U/kg,柠檬酸对照,500U/kg,750 U/kg,1000 U/kg,1500 U/kg),每组处理3个重复。结果表明:植酸酶能够显著降低3种植物性原料中植酸磷的含量(P<0.05),同时提升有效磷的含量。通过对磷当量的分析,本试验中以植酸酶组1000 U/kg最为经济有效。植酸酶对照组中植酸磷含量也有所下降,说明柠檬酸单独对植酸起到了一定的分解作用。The study was aimed at assessing effects of microbial phytase treatment on the phytate phosphorous(phytate-P) content in three plant ingredients (soybean meal, corn gluten meal and wheat). Graded levels of microbial phytase were dissolved in citrate buffer to separately mix with soybean meal, corn gluten and wheat. Six treatments (phytase control, citrate acid control, 500 U/kg, 750 U/kg, 1000 U/kg and 1500 U/kg)for each plant material were completely randomized with three replicates. Results showed that the phytate-P contents decreased significantly( P 〈 0. 05 )while the available-P levels increased along with the increasing doses of phytase. According to the analysis of P equivalency, the dose of 1000 U/kg was most cost-efficient. The decline of phytate-P contents in control group indicated that citrate buffer also could hydrolyze some of the phytate. The combination of phytase and citrate significantly decreased the contents of phytate- P in the plant ingredients. There was the possibility that synergic effect existed between phytase and citrate acid.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.14