检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳飞机设计研究所一部,辽宁沈阳110035 [2]西北工业大学机电学院,陕西西安710072
出 处:《航空计算技术》2007年第2期14-19,共6页Aeronautical Computing Technique
基 金:航空科学基金(03B53003);辽宁省科学技术航空专项基金(20044007)
摘 要:为了探讨大展弦比直机翼的结构布局形式,借鉴自然界中的鱼骨和鸟羽毛以及树叶的叶脉形式,利用有限元分析与满应力优化作为设计手段,对三种不同的结构布局形式(A构型、B构型和常规构型)开展基于强度、刚度以及重量条件限制下的有关响应的对比研究。计算结果表明:在不同尺度的等重量条件限制下,“A构型”弯曲刚度最大,扭转刚度居中;“B构型”弯曲刚度居中,扭转刚度最小;“常规构型”弯曲刚度最小,扭转刚度最大。分析得出机翼的翼肋布置应该“适当的”倾斜。最后给出三点结论。In order to discuss a structural layout of high aspect ratio wings, author uses fish skeleton and bird's feather as well as leaf's nervation in nature for reference. Finite element method (FEM) and full stress design (FSD) are combined as a design tool. Based on constraint of strength and rigidity as well as weight respectively, he proposes three different structural layouts for study of some responds, which are A layout and B layout along with general layout. Computational results express that on the different scale of the wing with the same weight constraint, ( 1 ) A layout has maximal bending rigidity and mid torsion rigidity, (2) B layout has mid bending rigidity and minimal torsion rigidity, (3) general layout has minimal bending rigidity and maximal torsion rigidity. Form the results we can obtain that ribs layout should be proper slant. Finally three conclusions have been drawn.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.67.34