中法刑事上诉制度比较研究  

The Comparative Study on Criminal Appeal Systems between China and France

作　　者：陆春镁[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《河南教育学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2007年第4期113-116,共4页Journal of Henan Institute of Education(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：法国的刑事上诉制度的设置有其独特之处。近年来有关该制度的司法改革也反映出法国在保障当事人权利和程序正义方面的努力。通过中法两国刑事上诉制度的比较研究,可以借鉴法国的相关经验,如实行有限审查原则,贯彻言辞辩论原则,建构科学的审级制度等。这对改进和完善我国的刑事上诉制度是极为有益的。The establishment of the criminal appeal system of France has its unique merits. In recent years, the judicial reforms relating to this system also reflected their effort on the safeguard for the rights to the persons and the procedural justice. By the comparative study on criminal appeal systems between China and France, we can learn from the relating experiences of France, e.g. executing the limited examination principle,implementing words debate principle and constructing scientific judging level system, etc. It is beneficial for us to improve and perfect the criminal appeal system of China.

关 键 词：刑事上诉制度 比较 启示与借鉴 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]