刑事再生证据若干问题探讨  

On Criminal Derivation Proof

作　　者：朱英兰[1] 梁岩[2] 江峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学文法系,山东泰安271019 [2]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《河南公安高等专科学校学报》2007年第4期69-71,共3页Journal of Henan Public Security Academy

摘　　要：刑事再生证据的运用不仅有利于原生证据的收集和侦查活动的顺利进行,在特定情况下,还可以直接作为定案的根据。然而到目前为止,理论界和实务界对何为刑事再生证据、其功用何在以及如何认识其法律地位和效力等尚未形成统一的认识。因此,立足于我国刑事司法的现状,澄清有关刑事再生证据的一些理论问题,完善相应的证据规则,具有重大的现实意义。Criminal derivation proof is fact that reflects Accused person＇s activity of counter-detection. No one can deny that derivation proof is advantageous to collect other proofs and verify the case fact directly in specific situation. However, scholars cannot form unified understanding regarding many questions, such as derivation proof＇ s definition, function and legal status, and so on. So it is of great realistic significance and theoretical value to clarify the question and construct our system of derivation proof which based on our national condition.

关 键 词：刑事再生证据 法律效力 证据规则 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]