“垂死”之由、“新生”之路——评斯皮瓦克的《学科之死》  

Causes of the Discipline’s Death and the Way of Its Rebirth——On Spivak’s Death of a Discipline

作　　者：孙景尧[1] 张俊萍 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学中文系、河南大学比较文学与文化研究所,上海200234 [2]江南大学外语学院、上海师范大学中文系,江苏无锡214000

出　　处：《中国比较文学》2007年第3期1-10,共10页Comparative Literature in China

摘　　要：斯皮瓦克的《学科之死》在西方学界引起了强烈的反响，该书对我们重新审视西方比较文学特别是美国比较文学，尤其是探讨其“垂死”之由、“新生”之路，并进而反思我们的比较文学发展，具有重要的参考意义。本文评介论析了斯皮瓦克观点的独创之见和不足之处，进而探讨了该书给予我们的思考与启示。Spivak＇s Death of a Discipline, which has brought about heated discussion in western academia, is of significance to our resurveying of western comparative literature, especially that of U. S. It is also significant for a study on comparative literature＇s death and its rebirth, and for a reflection on the development of China＇s comparative literature. The paper makes an introductory study on the original ideas as well as the insufficiencies of Spivak＇s work. Besides, it discusses the inspiration and further thinking the book brought to us.

关 键 词：比较文学 全球化 星球化 知识装备 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]