检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅二医院心理研究中心
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2007年第4期418-419,439,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:湖南省自然科学基金资助(项目号:06JJ50025)
摘 要:目的:探讨青少年网络成瘾与家庭环境、父母教养方式的关系。方法:490名大学生被试完成网络成瘾诊断量表、家庭环境量表(FES-CV)和父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)的评定。结果:被试总体的网络成瘾检出率为7.6%;在家庭环境方面,网络成瘾组家庭矛盾性得分显著高于正常组;在父母教养方式方面,网络成瘾组与正常组在父情感温暖、父拒绝否认、父过度保护、父惩罚严厉、父过分干涉、母拒绝否认、母严厉惩罚、母情感温暖上的得分差异显著(P<0.05~0.001)。结论:矛盾的家庭环境和拒绝、否认、缺少温情的父母教养方式与青少年网络成瘾有关。Objective: To explore the relationship of internet addiction and family environment, parental rearing patterns in Adolescents. Methods: 490 students were assessed with Internet Addiction Disorder Test, FES-CV, and EMBU. Results: 7.6% subjects were defined as IAD according to Internet Addition Disorder test; the IAD group get a higher score in family contradictoriness (P〈0.05). There were significant difference between two groups in father's warmth, father's over-protection, father's over-interference, father's refusal, and father's severe punishment, and mother's severe punishment, mother's warmth, and mother's refusal (P〈0.05-0.001). Conclusion: Contradictory family environment and some unjustified rearing patterns, such as over-protection, over-interference, and refusal, may play a role in the development of internet addiction disorder in adolescents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63