检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《肿瘤》2007年第8期658-659,662,共3页Tumor
摘 要:目的:比较ELF方案联合卡铂动脉灌注与静脉滴注对晚期胃癌的治疗效果。方法:58例患者随机分为2组,均用ELF方案联合卡铂,其中动脉灌注28例,静脉滴注30例。结果:动脉灌注组完全缓解率17.86%(5/28),总有效率67.86%(19/28);静脉滴注组完全缓解率3.33%(1/30),总有效率36.67%(11/30)。2组间总有效率差异有统计学意义(2χ=5.64;P<0.05),2组中位生存期分别为10个月和5.5个月,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。结论:ELF方案联合卡铂动脉灌注治疗晚期胃癌局控率优于静脉滴注组,是治疗晚期胃癌的一种有效手段。Objective:To compare the effects of ELF regimen combined with intra-arterial or intravenous infusion of carboplatin on advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods: Fifty-eight patients with advanced gastric carcinoma were randomly divided into 2 groups. Twenty-eight patients received ELF regimen with intra-arterial infusion of carboplatin and thirty patients received ELF regimen with intravenous infusion of carboplatin. Results:The complete remission (CR) rate was 17.86% (5/28) and the overall response rate was 67.86% (19/28) for intra-arterial infusion group. The CR rate was 3.33% (1/30) and the overall response rate was 36.67% ( 11/ 30) for intravenous infusion group. The difference in the overall response rate between the two groups was significant (χ^2 = 5.64, P 〈 0.05 ). The median survival periods were 10 months for intra-arterial infusion group and 5.5 months for intravenous infusion group. The difference was significant ( P = 0.002 ). Conclusion: The local control rate is significantly higher in intra-arterial infusion group than that of intravenous infusion group. ELF regimen combined with intra-arterial infusion of carboplatin is an effective approach for advanced gastric cancer therapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.23.57