美国法典1404(a)与非方便法院原则辨析  

An Analysis of the 1404(a) in the United States Code and the Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience

作　　者：牟笛[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所,湖北武汉430071

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2007年第4期72-75,共4页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

摘　　要：由于美国法典28卷1404(a)条款的立法规定在功能与措辞上均非常类似普通法上的非方便法院原则,因此很多学者误以为该立法规定与非方便法院原则之间并不存在实质性的差异。然而,这一看法并不正确。事实上,1404(a)条款立法在法律效果、证明标准以及具体适用方面均与非方便法院原则存在显著的区别。Owing to the fact that the legislative function and wording of 28U.S.C.A§1404 （a）in United States Code resemble the doctrine of forum non convenience in common law, many scholars wrongly hold that this legislative regulation doesn＇t differ from the doctrine of forum non convenience in essence. Actually, there are marked differences between the item 1404 （a） and the doctrine of forum non convenience in the aspects such as legal effect, standards and concrete application.

关 键 词：国际民事诉讼 28 U.S.C.A. §1404(a) 非方便法院原则 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]