哲学在何种意义上终结——兼与《马克思不是“哲学终结论者”》一文商榷  被引量:4

In What Meaning Has Philosophy Come to the End? A Query to the Article 'Marx Is Not a Person Thought Philosophy Had Come to the End'

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:游兆和[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国政法大学人文学院

出  处:《学术研究》2007年第8期26-31,共6页Academic Research

摘  要:断言"马克思不是‘哲学终结论者’"缺乏历史与逻辑根据。马克思、恩格斯提出"哲学终结"的历史背景是19世纪实证科学思潮的兴起与德国古典思辨哲学的终结,由此"哲学终结"也就具有"思辨哲学"与"全部哲学"终结的双重含义,而"哲学"最终将"消失"在"实证科学"之中则是其最一般的结论。马克思、恩格斯对"哲学终结"两重含义的不同表述,体现了其哲学终结思想的历史特点。The assertion that Marx is not'an adherent to the view of the end of philosophy'lacks evidences both historically and logically. It is in the background with the rising of positivist science and the ending of the German classical reasoning philosophy that Marx and Engels tended to claim the end of philosophy, which was hence endowed with the completion of both reasoning philosophy and complete philosophy, as'philosophy will disappear in positivist science'is an utmost general conclusion. The differences in depicting the two aspects by Marx and Engels made the historical features of their thought of the end of philosophy.

关 键 词:哲学终结 历史背景 思辨哲学 实证科学 

分 类 号:B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象