乳腺癌根治术后两种包扎方式的对比  

ComparaUon of two kinds of bandage methods between patients with radical mastectomy of breast cancer

作　　者：王霞[1] 王志莲[1] 王云展[1] 刘纪君[1] 赵惠香[1] 解树英[1] 

机构地区：[1]滨州医学院附属医院普外科,256603

出　　处：《现代护理》2007年第06X期1675-1676,共2页Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的 探讨乳腺癌根治术后减少并发症的合理的包扎方式。方法 选择83例乳腺癌患者随机分为非加压包扎组和加压包扎组,观察术后引流量,皮下积液率,皮瓣坏死率,切口Ⅰ期愈合率。结果 非加压包扎组引流量高于加压包扎组,皮下积液率明显低于加压包扎组,2组比较有显著差异（P〈0.05）。非加压包扎组皮瓣坏死率明显的低于加压包扎组,切口Ⅰ期愈合率明显高于加压包扎组,2组比较差异有显著性意义（P〈0.01）。结论 非加压包扎能明显减少乳腺癌术后并发症,增加患者舒适感。Objective To investigate the applicable method of bandage to decrease the postoperative complication of patients with radical mastectomy of breast cancer. Methods 83 cases were divided into two group randomly. The experimental group received with non pressured dressing and double suction drainage, the control group were treated with tradition method. Results The effect of drainage, the incidence of subcutaneous hydrops, skin flap necrosis and the cure rate of the wounds were different significantly between groups. The result showed priority in experimental group to control group. Conclusions The method of pressured dressing and double suction drainage could decrease the postoperative complication of patients with radical mastectomy of breast cancer obviously.

关 键 词：非加压包扎 双管负压引流 乳腺癌 

分 类 号：R737[医药卫生—肿瘤]