检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢德荣[1] 梁汉霖[2] 杨琼[1] 江志敏[1] 郭双双[1] 陈邓林[1] 毕卓菲[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第二医院肿瘤科,广东广州510120 [2]中山大学附属中山市人民医院化疗科,广东中山528403
出 处:《中山大学学报(医学科学版)》2007年第5期565-569,共5页Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University:Medical Sciences
摘 要:【目的】Meta分析提示吉西他滨(GEM)联合化疗一线治疗晚期胰腺癌优于标准的GEM单药化疗,在此基础上进行亚组生存结果的meta分析及资料更新,旨在寻找确切有效的化疗方案。【方法】通过MEDLINE、EMBASE、ASCO、ECCO等数据库及论文集检索相关文献。按纳入标准筛选新增文献并进行资料更新。主要对各亚组进行半年生存率、其次是1年生存率的meta分析。【结果】17个随机对照临床试验(RCT)共3 821例患者纳入分析,按化疗方案分为GEM联合顺铂(GEMDDP)、GEM固定剂量率输注联合奥沙利铂(GEMOX)、联合5FU(GEMFU)、联合卡培他滨(GEMCAP)以及联合伊立替康(GEMIRI)等5个亚组,各亚组半年生存率的治疗优势(RD)分别为5%(P=0.24)、9%(P=0.005)、2%(P=0.46)、7%(P=0.03)和-1%(P=0.88);1年生存率RD为6%(P=0.11)、5%(P=0.07)、4%(P=0.19)、5%(P=0.08)和0(P=0.97)。【结论】现有的证据提示GEMOX、GEMCAP联合化疗方案一线治疗晚期胰腺癌,有较好的应用前景,值得进一步的临床试验。[Objective] Previous meta-analyses had shown gemcitabie (GEM)-based combination chemotherapy was superior to GEM monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer (APCa), Subgroup analyses were performed using updated information to seek for the exactly effective GEM-based combination regimen to benefit patients with APCa. [Methods] Subgroup meta-analyses of all previously published or unpublished studies were performed with a comprehensive search of the updated literature including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ASCO and ECCO. The analyses included all randomized evidence to compare GEM combination chemotherapy with GEM alone with respect to 6- month survival rate (6-mo SR) and 1-year survival rate (1-y SR) in APCa patients. [Results] Seventeen RCTs involving 3821 patients were included in this meta-analysis, which were divided into five subgroups according to the combination chemotherapy regimen, GEM plus cisplatin (GEMDDP), fixed-dose rate infusion of GEM plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX), GEM plus 5-fluorouracil (GEMFU), GEM plus capecitabine (GEMCAP) and GEM plus irinotecan (GEMIRI). Subgroup analyses showed the risk difference (RD) of 6-mo SR were 5% (P=0.24), 9% (P= 0.005), 2% (P=0.46), 7% (P=0.03) and -1% (P=0.88), respectively; and the 1-y SR 6% (P=0.11), 5% (P=0.07), 4% (P=0.19), 5% (P=0.08), and 0% (P=0.97), respectively. [Conclusion] Based on the available evidence, GEMOX and GEMCAP regimens may be considered promising regimen as the front-line therapy for APCa, which encourages further clinical trials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145