检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王元骧 ZHU Li-yuan , WANG Yue-chuan, PENG Fu-chun , SU Hong bin, WANG Yuan-xiang (1. Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, Chian; 2. Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University ,Beijing 100871 ,China; 3. Department of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072,China; 4. Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China)
出 处:《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2007年第5期5-7,共3页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
摘 要:有关文艺本体论的研究在20世纪80年代曾经风靡一时,但近年来随着后现代主义思潮的传播和大众文化的发展,许多学者把目光转向了新兴的文化批评,他们打着反本质主义的旗号,认为体系化的基础理论研究已经过时,文艺本体论自然也就受到了人们的冷落。而在我们看来,本体论问题在任何时代都不应该也不可能过时,因为它所探讨的是具有普遍和终极意义的存在问题,所解决的是人们生存的根基和价值问题。特别是当今社会物欲膨胀、价值失范,人们正遭遇着严重的精神和信仰危机;在文学以及文化领域,后现代写作和大众文化的泛滥所带来的文艺深度的消解、中心的缺席、意义的丧失的情况下,加强文艺本体论研究更有着十分迫切的现实意义。为此,我们约请了几位对文艺本体论问题有过长期深入研究的学者发表自己最新的看法。Although the research on literary ontology had been hot in literary circles in the 1980s, it has been treated coldly in recent years as many scholars have shifted their interest to new cultural criticism due to the dissemination of post-modernism and the development of popular culture, and they unfurl the banner of anti essentialism and think that systematic basic theory research has been out of date. But we think that ontology shouldn't and can't be out of date in any age, since it explores the meaning of being which is the question of universal and ultimate significance to us, and solves the question concerning the foundation and values of our existence. In a society with moral irregularity and prevalent material or human desires, people are all encountering the serious spirit crisis and belief crisis. In the field of art and literature, for example, the depth has been reduced, the centre has been absent, and meaning has vanished. Considering all these, it is of urgent realistic significanee to enhance the study of literary ontology. For this reason, we invite four experts in this area to state their new points of view. In his article My Views on Literature and Ontology, Prof. Zhu IAyuan makes an etymological study of the term ontology and clarifies the long-standing mistaken conception in this regard, before reviewing the development of ontology briefly and inspecting the important changes that have happened to ontology in modern philosophy. According to him, modern ontology should be the theory of practice, while literature should be regarded as a basic means of existence. In his The Crisis and Hope of Literary Ontology, Prof. Wang Yuechuan thinks that modern ontology has corrected the mistake of ignoring man in classical ontology, and regarded man's existence as the core. The mission of literature and ontology is to examine and establish the value of man's existence, which is of realistic significance for us to overcome today's nihilism and rebuild our spiritual homeland. In his Th
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15